Procurement for Supply and Installation of Hormone Analyzer to Various Master Health Checkup Centre at RGGGH,
reference not parsedTNMSC
Particulars
3a8394fd_CA131_2022.pdf
- Reference
- —
- Dated
- —
- Inviting authority
- The General Manager (E)
- Bids invited
- 29.11.2021
- Opened
- 15.02.2021
- Bids declared
- 1
- On record
- 5 firms / 5 lines
- Schedules
- 1
- Procuring entity
- TNMSC
Pre-award integrity screen
1 lowRe-run
Verify, don’t concludeevery flag has an innocent explanation too
- lowBidder has no record in this datasetno_history
2 name(s) could not be matched to any firm in the indexed award history. That may simply mean a new or out-of-state supplier, or a spelling variant — but a newly incorporated entity bidding on a large contract is worth verifying against the company registry.
Evidence- REAGENTS
- CONTROLS
REAGENTSCONTROLS
Bidders on record
5 firms
(single schedule)
| # | Bidder | Address | Price | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hormone Analyzer | — | not published | Not selected |
| 2 | Reagents ( | — | not published | Not selected |
| 3 | Calibrators ( | — | not published | Not selected |
| 4 | Controls ( | — | not published | Not selected |
| 5 | Consumables(Excl 12% & 18% GST) | — | not published | Not selected |
Blank price ≠ identical bid
These documents publish the awarded price per schedule, not what each bidder quoted, so the figure appears only against the winner. Price-clustering analysis needs the bid tabulation sheet, which is not published.